The Gazette Today

IT'S WORTH DAILY

INDIA, BHARAT, HINDUSTAN, MELUHA OR ANYTHING ELSE? | Bharatvarsh|Part -1

5 min read
Ancient India is that the Indian subcontinent from the prehistoric times to the beginning of Medieval India. Ancient India or Bharat was composed of modern-day India, Pakistan, Afghanistan (some portions), Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and even Burma.
india, bharat, Hindustan

INDIA, BHARAT, HINDUSTAN, MELUHA OR ANYTHING ELSE? Let’s dig some soil to seek out this.

Ancient India is the Indian subcontinent from the prehistoric times to the beginning of Medieval India. Ancient India or Bharat was composed of modern-day India, Pakistan, Afghanistan (some portions), Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and even Burma. India comes from the “Indus river” and the name “Bharat” is referencing the traditional mythological emperor whose story is understood for its glory and dharma i.e. MAHABHARATA.

Archaeological excavations have discovered artifacts employed by early humans, including stone tools, which suggest a particularly early date for human habitation and technology within the area of early Hindustan. While the civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt have long been recognized for his or her celebrated contributions to civilization, India has often been overlooked, especially within the West, though its history and culture are simply as rich.

Recognition of the antiquity of the presence of Heidelberg man (a proto-human who was an ancestor of recent Homo sapiens), which suggests ancient humans, in India has been largely thanks to the fairly late archaeological interest within the area as, unlike adding Mesopotamia and Egypt, western excavations in India didn’t begin in earnest until the 1920s CE. Though the traditional city of Harappa was known to exist as early as 1842 CE, its archaeological significance was ignored and therefore the later excavations corresponded to an interest in locating the probable sites mentioned within the great Indian epics Mahabharata and Ramayana (both of the 5th or 4th centuries BCE) while ignoring the likelihood of a way more ancient past for the region.

The village of Balathal (near Udaipur in Rajasthan), to cite just one example, illustrates the antiquity of India’s history because it dates to 4000 BCE. Balathal wasn’t discovered until 1962 CE and excavations weren’t begun there until the 1990s CE.

Ancient India 600 BCE

As you all know, within the past 50 years the archaeological excavations have dramatically changed the understanding of India’s past and also world history. It’s now understood that significant act was underway in India by the Holocene Period (10,000 years ago) which many historical assumptions based upon earlier add Egypt and Mesopotamia, got to be reviewed and revised. The beginnings of the Vedic tradition in India, still practiced today, can now be dated, a minimum of partially, to the indigenous people of ancient sites like Balathal instead of, as often claimed, wholly to the Aryan invasion of 1500 BCE.

Apart from Bharat though, there are few other names related to the country also that trace their roots to Vedic literature. As an example, ‘Aryavarta’, as mentioned within the Manusmriti, mentioned the land occupied by the Indo-Aryans within the space between the Himalayas within the north and therefore the Vindhya mountain ranges within the south. The name ‘Jambudvipa’ or the ‘land of the Jamun trees’ has also appeared in several Vedic texts, and remains utilized in a couple of Southeast Asian countries to explain the Indian subcontinent. Jain literature on the opposite hand also lays claim to the name Bharat but believes that the country was called ‘Nabhivarsa’ before. “King Nabhi was the father of Rishabhanatha (the first Tirthankara) and grandfather of Bharata,” writes geographer Anu Kapur in her book

The name ‘Hindustan’ was the primary instance of a nomenclature having political undertones. It had been first used when the Persians occupied the Indus valley within the seventh century BCE. Hindu was the Persianised version of the Sanskrit Sindhu, or the Indus, and was wont to identify the lower Indus basin. From the primary century of the Christian era, the Persian suffix, ‘stan’ was applied to make the name ‘Hindustan’.

At an equivalent time, the Greeks who had acquired knowledge of ‘Hind’ from the Persians, transliterated it as ‘Indus’, and by the time the Macedonian ruler Alexander invaded India within the third century BCE, ‘India’ had come to be identified with the region beyond the Indus.

“Meluha, it’s now generally agreed, was the name by which the Indus civilization was known to the Mesopotamians: Meluha was the foremost distant of the trio of foreign lands, and therefore the imports from Meluha mentioned in Sumerian and Akkadian texts, like timbers, carnelian, and ivory, match the resources of the Harappan realms,” writes archaeologist Jane R. McIntosh in her book.

But Meluha, of course, had lost currency way before modern political systems developed within the region. The earliest recorded name that continues to be debated is believed to be ‘Bharat’, ‘Bharata’, or ‘Bharatvarsha’, that’s also one among the 2 names prescribed by the Indian constitution.

Now back to what we started at; INDIA, BHARAT, HINDUSTAN, MELUHA OR ANYTHING ELSE? This question is irrelevant now because what so ever it is, it still has the essence of its beauty, love, nature, history, and warmth.

2 thoughts on “INDIA, BHARAT, HINDUSTAN, MELUHA OR ANYTHING ELSE? | Bharatvarsh|Part -1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *